Fixing The Broken Model
The problems with the traditional percentage fee model
The founder of Vanguard, Jack Bogle once said “The miracle of compound returns is overwhelmed by the tyranny of compounding costs”’
The compound effect of a percentage fee of your money can be significant, particularly with larger portfolios over lengthy periods of time.
Many couples now experience retirements lasting 30 years or more, and the percentage fees charged by wealth managers can create a very costly drag on returns.
In simple terms, the more money invested, the greater the fees paid to the wealth manager.
According to a survey by Which? the average annual fee is 1% of the money invested.
This could mean that if you have a £1m portfolio you will pay £10,000 each year in fees and if you have £100,000 invested pay £1,000, often for an identical service.
This doesn’t seem fair or reasonable.
Conflict of Interest
On a percentage-based fee model, the wealth manager may receive an immediate reduction in their fee income if money is removed from the portfolio.
So, typical lifestyle events such as making gifts to children, buying property, or investing in
a business could lead to a reduction in the manager’s fee revenue.
This may create a conflict.
By linking wealth management fees directly to a percentage of the money invested, the wealth manager will be paid only if you invest your capital.
No investment means no fees.
The Financial Conduct Authority has expressed concerns over contingent charging and the
need for wealth managers to sell investments to be remunerated.
Download our guide to
More about Fees from our blog
There is something of a paradox built into the delivery of wealth management services today. On the one hand, the main reason why you seek advice from a financial planner in the first place is
The cost of living is on everyone’s lips. No matter where you turn; the radio, television, social media, or newspapers, the message is clear. Costs are going up and budgets are being squeezed. For the